Selected disclosures assembled into a continuing object history. Associated business context retains its own company, product or site scope. Source-page links provide optional verification; the English account is intended to stand on its own.
Read the dated construction and operating milestones below. An installation stage or an engineering-progress percentage does not establish actual production. A programme and its component lines may describe the same capacity at different levels.
Exact physical address and coordinates have not yet been verified for this record.
Verified site coordinates: unavailable. No city-centre point is displayed as a plant location.
Only measurements attached to this record are shown. Values retain their original reporting scope; rows are not summed into an asset total.
| Measure | Value | Period / scope | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project budget | 245,558,900 USD | 2017-12-31india proposal / india proposal | FY2017, p. 136 |
The following sections retain the full available English descriptions and their source context. Associated business context describes its named product or base.
The Indian project continued design optimisation. Management said construction would begin at an appropriate time after overseas pandemic risks became controllable. This is a conditional plan, updating the pre-construction preparation in 2019. No construction-start or production milestone is assigned, and no precise future commissioning date is inferred.
Preparatory work for India continued, including surveys, preparation, approvals and design before construction. Management described the prospective facility as a third overseas manufacturing base. The statement remains prospective: preparatory work is not a construction start or an operating factory, and the report does not provide a committed commissioning date in this passage.
The report says the Indian project was progressing according to plan. In the same passage, Egypt phase III is explicitly described as producing and the United States project as under construction. The India statement gives less detail: no commissioning date, line capacity or producing-factory milestone is established here. It therefore remains a separate proposed overseas manufacturing project with an unresolved schedule.
The filing proposes a 100,000-tonne-per-year alkali-free glass-fiber line in phase II of the Talegaon industrial zone, Pune, Maharashtra, India. It describes a proposed company with a provisional name, a two-year construction period and total investment of USD 245,558,900, printed as 24,555.89 ten-thousand US dollars. Management describes the project as being advanced and includes it in the following-year programme; that is not evidence of a commissioned factory. The proposed zone and city are retained as the issuer’s location statement, without assigning a verified street address or coordinates. The dollar proposal must not be added directly to the renminbi construction budgets, and a two-year schedule is not a verified completion date.